An Accident Reconstruction Primer

Visitors accidents are the elefant within the room no person wants to talk about. We go about our daily lives not having thought for one second about what might happen if we are engaged in a significant crash, because we always believe our vehicle will never be the the one that is being craned out of a deep ravine, or loaded onto a flatbed truck in a whole lot of00 twisted metal. Sadly, statistics suggest it is more likely than not that some who read this will be engaged in a serious car accident at some time in your daily course. Further more, in our increasingly litigious culture, there is is present an extremely real potential that we will end up involved as plaintiffs or defendants in a civil or unlawful action caused by a car accident. When this happens, you should hire the best legal professional you can afford, and preserve as much evidence as you can. Every driver should understand a little about why is up a typical accident study, if only to protect his or her own interests in the aftermath of a terrible collision.

In most cases, incident reconstructionists are professional experts and consultants who are usually retained by legal advocates. We are often engineers, physicists, ex-police authorities, or highway safety experts, but we are focused by experience and training in the analysis of traffic collisions. Though we usually improve the legal advocates defending or prosecuting a particular case, we are independent of any particular “side” in the best action. The tale of each accident analysis is different, but the efforts accident reconstructionists travel along well-worn paths to eventually arrive at our expert opinions. 

At the first consultation with a potential client we may reject a case because it does not show up that we will offer any help (e. g. their client is evidently at fault, you cannot find any legitimate incident to reconstruct, the deadline is too soon, and so forth. ). Sometimes initial contact is made at the accident location so that the issues and circumstances can much better comprehended and an informed decision can be made as to whether or not we should become included. Accident reconstructionists try to avoid being compelled to render opinions unlike our client’s case.

Determine the facts. Usually the first evidentiary item found in a normal file is the traffic collision report (TCR), because they are called in California; elsewhere they have other names. This kind of documents the police analysis in the accident and usually provides almost all of the truthful information required to conduct an analysis. However some accidents are more thoroughly investigated by law enforcement than others, most reports identify the parties and their vehicles, provide witness statements and info, offer some information of the accident landscape when it was found by the investigating official, and may contain some measurements and/or diagrams that describe the locations of numerous items of physical proof. This evidence might include any tire marks, pointe, dirt tracks, debris, and the vehicles’ points of rest. Hopefully the exploration includes photographs of the scene, that happen to be critical to any traffic collision survey. It seems that law enforcement officials officers do not always think so since about 50% of the failures I investigate include field photographs, and less than half of those instances include useful photographs due to low priority most companies placed on accident investigation training. This really is a terrible waste because peoples’ memories change with time, but photos can preserve evidence that was not collected at the scene of the crash or memorialize momentary conditions that no much longer exist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *